Global Themes

On Globalization & Venture Capital

What might stall the “Great Chinese Growth Engine”?

chatham-house-logo.jpg        A few weeks ago, I attended a fascinating talk at Chatham House by Professor Wing Thye Woo who teaches Economics at the University of California on “The Real Challenges to China’s Continued High Growth”

He identified three important factors which might lead to the “crash of a speeding car” aka the “Great Chinese Growth Engine”:

  • Hardware failure: “right tire burst” = collapse of a crucial economic mechanism
  • Software failure: “fight within car” = social disorder
  • Power supply failure: “no petrol” = limits from ecological barrier or external sanctions

He also cited several interesting statistics in his presentation of which the two below particularly stood out for me:

  1. “Social Disorder”: 1994 had 10,000 mass incidents involving 730,000 persons? in 2004 the number had gone up to 74,000 mass incidents involving 3.7 million people.
  2. China’s GINI coefficient has almost doubled from .24 in ‘78 to .47 in 2005

The China Policy Institute, which made it all happen, wrote its own report on the talk which can be accessed here.  The report nicely summarised the key points. I would recommend it and the slides to everyone who is watching China and its impact on the global economy.

A few excerpts:

“…China had enjoyed the highest sustained economic growth rate of any country in recorded history, he said, and it was probable that this high growth model would succeed.

But it was important to examine the factors most likely to disrupt the high growth rate from continuing…

…Professor Woo said that perhaps the greatest challenge to China’s continued high growth in China would be future global disputes over resources and the environment, following what he called the unravelling of the global consensus for free trade in the United States, which was making the atmosphere ripe for protectionism.

As China and India moved up the value chain in manufacturing complexity, he said, Western countries were being forced to make painful adjustments as more and more jobs were lost. At the same time they would be faced with demands to help pay for the environmental improvements needed in countries like China and India to curb carbon dioxide emissions, he said.

…The best way to reduce CO2 emissions was to ensure that the new power generation capacity installed in China and India made use of modern, clean coal technology, he said, but this would mean that the richer countries would have to offer to pay for this in order to enjoy the benefits.

This made the atmosphere also ripe for what he called a coming global clash over the “Global Commons” not just air but also water as well. Asia, he said, faced a looming water crisis as China made plans to divert the flow of water to rivers such as the Bramaputra and the Mekong that flowed into India and Southeast Asia…”

June 24th, 2007 Posted by Shantanu | China, Development Issues, Economics, Emerging Markets, Globalization | 3 comments

India & China: so different, yet so alike

In its latest “Index of Failed States“, Foreign Policy magazine has ranked India (at # 110) way ahead of China (and Russia – both at #62) in terms of stability while Pakistan jostles for a position in the “Top 10″ (at # 12) with North Korea (at # 13) – both nuclear armed for good measure.

and yet the report describes China in words that could have almost been written for India:

“…the growing divide between urban and rural, as well as continued protests in the countryside, reveals pockets of frailty that the central govenment is only just beginning to address”.

rankings-up-fs2007.gif For the curious amongst you, the top 3 places in the Index go to Sudan, Iraq and Somalia.

Related posts:

Why India will* overtake China – II

China, India and the “3D Advantage”

India, China and the next decade…

Of Googlies*, Cricket, India and China

.

June 21st, 2007 Posted by Shantanu | China, Development Issues, Emerging Markets, Globalization, India | 2 comments

The Gospel according to Goldman Sachs

My good friend Tosh (author of “The Rising Elephant“) sent me one of his recent articles last week titled, “Eye On The Tigers” which makes the point that putting the all the BRIC countries in one basket may not only be unwieldy but also confusing and possibly inconsistent.

brics-report-pic.jpg  Excerpts:

The BRICs report published in 2003 by Goldman Sachs – which foresaw the rise of Brazil, Russia, India and China as global economc powerhouses, has acquired the aura of a Delphic Oracle.

Nevertheless, it remains confusing with regard to some key assumptions and conclusions, particularly for policymakers.

The first problem is the heterogeneousness of the BRIC membership. Demographically, Brazil and Russia have a combined population of just 330 million – against 2.4 billion for India and China.

Russia, by many accounts still a nuclear-armed superpower, is essentially an exporter of com m odities to the West and of arms to China and India – which, in some cases, its own armed forces cannot afford.

Russia is also ageing fast: 15 percent of its population is over 65 years old,against a mere 5 percent in India.

For its part, Brazil’s growth is three to four times lower, and its income distribution far more skewered, than India and China.

Indeed, the lack of a meaningful middle class is one reason for Brazil’s stagnation, while its presence in India underpins the surprising spurt in its GDP growth.

More perplexing is Goldman Sachs’s faith in the three-fold gap between Chinese and Indian GDP lasting for the next 25 years.

India has been far more efficient than China in moving up the global value chain.

Its telecoms market is now the w orld’s fastest grow ing.Outbound Indian acquisitions, ahead of China in both quality and scale, are another example.

… All this may be overlooked.

What cannot is the report’s unquestioning faith in the continuity of the current global order.

To show precedents for the BRICs, the Goldm an Sachs team turn to Japan and Germany’s rapid growth after World War II.  Such straight-line insight may well apply to Japan and Germany, or Brazil and Russia…

To imagine this is true for India and China, inhabited by a third of the w orld’s population (and sometime soon, half its workforce), is curious.

…Devoid of the yardstick of the dollar,  things look quite different . Both within the BRICs,and for the world outside.

For in purchasing power terms, China’s econom y is over tw ice the size of India’s,  while India’s is larger than those of Brazil and Russia combined.

More dramatic is the fact that the Indian and Chinese econom ies are together already equivalent to those of the U S or the EU.

*****

I would enourage you to read the article in full – especially if you have anything to do with policy-making in Europe.

June 6th, 2007 Posted by Shantanu | China, Emerging Markets, Globalization, India | 2 comments

A dream of “Democratizing Content”

When I first heard of Lokmanch.com earlier this year, I was intrigued.

“Lokmanch”(”People’s Platform” in Hindi) is an independent Hindi news aggregator site operating out of India. About three months ago, I got in touch with the two founders and was impressed by their enthusiasm, passion and obvious love for the business.

Although their position on (and perception of) “Globalization” is very different from my own take on it…I could not help admire the amount of work and energy that they had put in this effort. As it happened. I had the chance to meet with them a few weeks after the first conversation…and I came away from the meeting hooked!

Lokmanch’s vision is simple yet powerful – to make news and content available easily and freely in languages other than English and to be an alternative to current mainstream (English) media in India.

I would like to extend this idea a little further…and this is the dream  – to make information/content available to anyone, anywhere and anytime, freely…In the context of India, other than the obvious difficulties in “anywhere” and “anytime”, you also face the challenge of “anyone” since a large number of people do not speak English* – hence the appeal of non-English online news aggregator(s) like Lokmanch. This is what I would call ”Democratizing Content“.

I am excited by this and will be watching them closely…and I wonder if there is any similar site (independently aggregating regional, local news content) catering to the Chinese speaking population?

.

* Although by 2010, India will have the world’s largest number of English speakers and as Prof. David Crystal has memorably noted elsewhere, “When 300 million Indians speak a word in a certain way, that will be the way to speak it.”!

May 17th, 2007 Posted by Shantanu | Entrepreneurship, Globalization, India, Miscellaneous | 10 comments

Globalization: A Lost Opportunity?

Under a nicely provocative headline titled “UK businesses signing their death warrants with their ignorance“, the chilli recently quoted from Grant Thornton’s International Business Report, while commenting on UK SMEs and globalization.

Amongst other things, it noted that:

“…less than half of UK businesses (46 percent) believed that globalization presented an opportunity to their country” compared to “82 percent of Indian businesses who believed that globalization presented a significant opportunity for their country…”

The story also mentioned: “UK business owners felt that (the economic expansion of the BRIC countries) over the past few years (has) had very little impact on their own companies”

A few other startling findings:

  • 79% of UK businesses are ignoring opportunities to import from China
  • 90% have no plans to export to India and
  • 87% have no plans to export to China

…all of which suggests to me a great opportunity (and a market) waiting to be tapped.

May 10th, 2007 Posted by Shantanu | China, Emerging Markets, Europe and Asia, Globalization, India | 4 comments

Haunted by Globalization…

One of the things that I enjoy about blogging and my travels is it gives me a wonderful opportunity to pick up data points that otherwise would be lost in the noise of daily routine…the best moment of all is when one discerns a pattern amidst the din of news and the burden of information overload.

One such moment happened recently…starting with this story in the International Herald Tribune on Tuesday (3rd April): “India outsourcing moves to front office”.

Anand Giridharadas wrote in the report how “quietly, but steadily” the received wisdom about the non-offshorability (for want of a better word) of “high-end careers requiring graduate degrees and commanding six-figure salaries” was being challenged by recent developments in India.

Amongst other things, he noted how “The pool of jobs once thought to be impossible to outsource is gradually evaporating” and how “investment banks like Morgan Stanley are hiring Indians to analyze U.S. stocks, a job that can pay $200,000 a year or more on Wall Street.”

Keep Reading…

April 6th, 2007 Posted by Shantanu | Globalization, Immigration, India | 2 comments

« Previous PageNext Page »